The Steroid Era in major league baseball changed the game in
many ways. Majestic home runs and high
powered offenses became prevalent. Power
was glamorous and glorious and commonplace.
Salaries skyrocketed along with the pitchers’ ERA’s. In the midst of all this run scoring,
something horrible happened. Once proud,
successful small markets teams were priced out of the market for the muscle
bound big boppers that suddenly ruled the game.
Organizations such as Kansas City,
Pittsburg, Cincinnati,
San Diego, Oakland,
and Minnesota were on the outside
looking in as the fat cats threw money at slugging free agents year after
year. Teams had to change their business
model to even hope to compete. Success had
to be built from within each organization through the draft and be selective
with the leftover free agents. There was
very little room for error and teams that missed on their top picks soon became
buried in the standings.
The movie Moneyball
is really the story of Billy Beane, a former first round draft pick of the New
York Mets. More so than the book by the
same name, the film tells the story of Beane’s struggle to think outside of the
box. As the general manager for the
small market Oakland A’s, he had to
watch a successful team from the 2001 playoffs be dismantled. Free agent star players from that team were
plucked away by teams with deep pockets like the Yankees and Red Sox,
frustrating Beane to no end. A chance
meeting with a Yale graduate named Peter Brand led Beane and the A’s to embrace
a form of player evaluation based on mathematics and algebraic formulas rather
the excepted commonplace evaluations used for decades.
The movie follows Beane’s travails trying to convince his
own scouting and coaching staffs of the relevance and possibilities of trying
something new, as well as following Beane’s own career through flashbacks. Beane and Brand searched for players who had
the skill set of getting on base but for whatever reason were undervalued by
the market. The film chronicles the 2002
season for the A’s as the team struggles to produce the results Beane and Brand
expect and what happens when those expectations finally came to fruition. The book devotes a great deal of space to the
drafting process and philosophies and that part is completely ignored in the
movie.
Moneyball is not
just a film for baseball lovers and stat nerds, although it probably
helps. The movie is dramatic and
exciting and does a good job at explaining the process for non baseball fans. Brad Pitt portrays Beane with just the right
amount of charisma and quirkiness. Jonah
Hill is Brand and seems woefully uncomfortable through most of the movie. Philip Seymour Hoffman is pretty good as
Manager Art Howe, who according to the movie, fights Beane tooth and nail on
Beane’s new vision but accepts the accolades when success is attained.
The fact is Moneyball
the book, and the success of the 2002 A’s had a huge impact on baseball,
especially now, as baseball recovers from the Steroid Era. Not only have small market teams embraced
sabermetrics (the term for the algebraic application to baseball) but big
market teams have as well. If you have
every watched and game between the Yankees and Red Sox, you will know how long
and drawn out each contest can become.
One of the philosophies of sabermetrics is to work pitch counts and get
on base as often as possible, really embracing base on balls. This has caused games to drag on at
times. Some teams have been slow to
embrace the new method. The Kansas City
Royals for instance, a very cash poor team, was very slow to embrace
sabermetrics. Other teams, such as the
Twins, Yankees, and Red Sox have all had a lot of success. In the case of the Yankees and Red Sox, money
and sabermetrics have lead to championships.
Now, all teams pay attention to the mathematics of baseball and not just
the raw results. As the power and
glamour of the Steroid Era fades and statistics return to the levels known
before the game was ruled by cheaters, sabermetrics is now becoming more and
more accepted throughout the game and once again the small market teams are
forced to look for success outside of the box again. That is for another day.
Moneyball is a
baseball movie but I don’t believe you have to be a baseball fan to enjoy
it. It’s a good story and it plays out
well on the big screen. Pitt and Hoffman
give good performances and director Bennett Miller seemed intent on not bogging
the movie down with the math itself or on discussing the draft process, which
would bore non baseball fans. If you are
a fan of sports movies or films high on drama, give Moneyball a chance.
Thanks for supporting my blogs at jawsrecliner.blogspot.com
and jawsportsandstuff.blogspot.com and get twitter updates @jawsrecliner
No comments:
Post a Comment